Let's start with first breaking down the definition of limit. Using Oxford dictionary, 1. A point or level beyond which something does not or may not extend or pass. I don't like this definition, because it's not explicit, it branches. Does not and may not are 2 complete different things. They would need 2 separate definitions to be more accurate. If you had a cup, and its limit of being full was the rim of the cup, it can not be filled anymore, therefore "does not extend or pass." And a speed limit can be, therefore, a different definition with "may not extend or pass." And then the second definition, being 2. A restriction on the size or amount of something permissible or possible. This definition is basically the same thing but uses different context. Permissible and possible counter each other into needing 2 separate definitions. There are a few more definitions, but really they all break down to being the same 2 points. Objective limits and subjective limits. I argue that subjective limits are imaginary and only held by someone or someone's, and objective limits are impossible to pass. Speed limits can be passed because they are set by someone, and a glass of water filled to the brim, is at its limit, because the glass has a set size and can only contain that much water.

First time I got pulled over for speeding, I...