2 views
The Indians Raja's fault
Once I had read a traditional story. The story was simple but the hidden message inside it was , how to be a king. The message was to sacrifice in need and to charge like a king for the services. When one is king, He absolutely not have to worry about money. That is bound to flow in the direction of the king.And if not then why would someone put his life on risk in pursuit of becoming a king.
Sacrifice is the first quality a king should possess. But if we focus on the Indian history especially in Mughal period, I vividly encounter problems with the Indian Rajas more especially to Hindus kings. The Battle of Khanwa, Babur and Ranasanga, Yet The Rajput lord fight fiercely against Babur. Infact Babur was terrified to see his adamant heroic performance at the battlefield. Even the shriek of Rangasanga filled the terror inside the heart of Babur and on the other hand it fills the euphoria among others Rajput warriors. Rajput are ready to kill or to be get killed in the battlefield. He has not seen in his life to someone who is fearless to death. Somewhere in his heart he was sunken and certain to his defeat.
But the story twists and he wins thats the history.Now , What was missing ? Why Ranasanga lost the battle ? Why was mughals succeeded in sprawling their empire in India.
It's the pundits or Brahmins that is to be blame. Really ! At first instance it comes in mind but as I read the lives of lord Krishna and his teachings from Bhagwad Gita, I had to shift the blame game on the fate of Ranasanga.
The culture of Mughals or the people who come from that land uses a technique that is to deceive, that is to sabbotage the culture of others, that is to rape the women, that is to spread atrocities to its maximum extent so that the people get terrified and hence can not retaliate back which is something our Indian ruler especially Hindu rulers lacked in capacity. That's the main reason of shrienking Hinduism and its ruler in India. The second thing that comes in mind is the lost of brotherhood in Hinduism and the hierarchy of caste system prevailing in Hinduism for years. That is the whole problem of the defeat. It's 2024 now, and it is same as it was at the time of Ranasanga though it's magnitude had reduced for sure. But it is even present today.
I see differently, I am correct or not that is definitely inside the womb of time But after seeing the incident of Bangladesh one could probably think about what would have happened in Pakistan at the time of independence to the minor Hindus.
To become a king one has to sacrifice but it's not only the sacrifice, one has to be expert in spreading the atrocities if not to that extent then also one should know how to kill enemies brutally. It's not a question about what is good or bad. It's about communicating with someone in the language that could make them understand. Shiva ji was the one hindu ruler who was able to communicate with the native language of mughals and that gave shivering shock to Aurangzeb till to his last breath. And If the Hindus donot change , I fear It may not be taught in history that once upon there used to be Hindus in the land called India.
© All Rights Reserved
Sacrifice is the first quality a king should possess. But if we focus on the Indian history especially in Mughal period, I vividly encounter problems with the Indian Rajas more especially to Hindus kings. The Battle of Khanwa, Babur and Ranasanga, Yet The Rajput lord fight fiercely against Babur. Infact Babur was terrified to see his adamant heroic performance at the battlefield. Even the shriek of Rangasanga filled the terror inside the heart of Babur and on the other hand it fills the euphoria among others Rajput warriors. Rajput are ready to kill or to be get killed in the battlefield. He has not seen in his life to someone who is fearless to death. Somewhere in his heart he was sunken and certain to his defeat.
But the story twists and he wins thats the history.Now , What was missing ? Why Ranasanga lost the battle ? Why was mughals succeeded in sprawling their empire in India.
It's the pundits or Brahmins that is to be blame. Really ! At first instance it comes in mind but as I read the lives of lord Krishna and his teachings from Bhagwad Gita, I had to shift the blame game on the fate of Ranasanga.
The culture of Mughals or the people who come from that land uses a technique that is to deceive, that is to sabbotage the culture of others, that is to rape the women, that is to spread atrocities to its maximum extent so that the people get terrified and hence can not retaliate back which is something our Indian ruler especially Hindu rulers lacked in capacity. That's the main reason of shrienking Hinduism and its ruler in India. The second thing that comes in mind is the lost of brotherhood in Hinduism and the hierarchy of caste system prevailing in Hinduism for years. That is the whole problem of the defeat. It's 2024 now, and it is same as it was at the time of Ranasanga though it's magnitude had reduced for sure. But it is even present today.
I see differently, I am correct or not that is definitely inside the womb of time But after seeing the incident of Bangladesh one could probably think about what would have happened in Pakistan at the time of independence to the minor Hindus.
To become a king one has to sacrifice but it's not only the sacrifice, one has to be expert in spreading the atrocities if not to that extent then also one should know how to kill enemies brutally. It's not a question about what is good or bad. It's about communicating with someone in the language that could make them understand. Shiva ji was the one hindu ruler who was able to communicate with the native language of mughals and that gave shivering shock to Aurangzeb till to his last breath. And If the Hindus donot change , I fear It may not be taught in history that once upon there used to be Hindus in the land called India.
© All Rights Reserved
