There is an unavoidable fact that we are imperfect. In the sense that our perfection is not obtained all at once, while our lifespan is limited to exploring all truth.

Our point of view is also not all-encompassing. This means that there is no realm of truth that we can fully explore.

So that we can expect only a little confirmed truth. And from the confirmed truth, it can be used to trace the further consequences that reveal another point of truth.

Even after establishing a speck or lump of truth or a mountain of truth, this too may not be completely perfect.

A simple example, those who believe that God exists, then does heaven and hell also exist? And if it is proven, then what about the other details surrounding the truth that have never been verified?

That is why, in the end, we are only able to firm up partial beliefs, as a concrete direction to start exploring.

So, instead of looking for certainty of all the details of the truth that are so stacked up, it is better to gradually increase the probability & possibility assessment. Measuring our truth-test achievements to the best we think it is.

Then it must be practiced. If our path is straight, then walk the truth seriously (strictly), will lead us to the next post of truth that further adds to the previous belief.

Each of them in the end may use Pascal's Wager as a decision in dealing with the probability (probability) of a possibility (possibility), but preferably by expanding the understanding, so that our attitude is based on probability with a high value (calculated from all our doubts)
© Seremonia