19 views
Khan Sir:The Case Study[Part-2].
[Please, 🥺 go for previous part if You didn't read it,if read then, ignore this statement].
✅5. The points where Khan Sir failed to explain a specific situation in UPSC studies?
→Why this question ⁉️ or a point is important because of Khan Sir is great in teaching with polite nature, but, from 100%,he is correct by 90%, but,wrong by 10%,so,less defects of 10% can works as sparks to destroy 90% correct image of a particular person.
I'm giving example,so,all will get my point clearly, because, I don't believe in unclearance.
1.
♾️Issue:-
From the topic of Tehreek e Labbaik Pakistan extremist party,Khan Sir pointing two kids in photo,and, saying that by pointing one kid that what is the need of coming small kid in this protest,if You don't study,then, You (this kid)will work on puncture repair shop as his fathers are doing,and,by pointing another kid will work on meat shop.
My thought🤔:-
Here, Sir is absolutely right because of Sir is saying that if kids will not study,then,they will work low-grade work for earning in future.
❌ Misconceptions:-Many muslims in India,why I'm talking about Indian Muslims because of Khan Sir is indian,He is not Chinese or Iranian...
Okay,here We go,many Indian Muslims thought that Khan Sir was insulting them or insulting all muslims,but, reality 😑 was something 🤔 different, Khan Sir was only saying these all things to Tehreek e Labbaik Pakistan extremist party,but,not to all Indian Muslims or Pakistani Muslims.
He only against Tehreek e Labbaik Pakistan extremist party, because,they were doing wrong ❌,so, don't include Yourself.
So,here Khan Sir is right✅.
But,on other side,if he said 🗣️ that what is the need of coming small kid in this protest,for some extent,I support Khan Sir's statement, because,life of kids in protests are at risks if...
✅5. The points where Khan Sir failed to explain a specific situation in UPSC studies?
→Why this question ⁉️ or a point is important because of Khan Sir is great in teaching with polite nature, but, from 100%,he is correct by 90%, but,wrong by 10%,so,less defects of 10% can works as sparks to destroy 90% correct image of a particular person.
I'm giving example,so,all will get my point clearly, because, I don't believe in unclearance.
1.
♾️Issue:-
From the topic of Tehreek e Labbaik Pakistan extremist party,Khan Sir pointing two kids in photo,and, saying that by pointing one kid that what is the need of coming small kid in this protest,if You don't study,then, You (this kid)will work on puncture repair shop as his fathers are doing,and,by pointing another kid will work on meat shop.
My thought🤔:-
Here, Sir is absolutely right because of Sir is saying that if kids will not study,then,they will work low-grade work for earning in future.
❌ Misconceptions:-Many muslims in India,why I'm talking about Indian Muslims because of Khan Sir is indian,He is not Chinese or Iranian...
Okay,here We go,many Indian Muslims thought that Khan Sir was insulting them or insulting all muslims,but, reality 😑 was something 🤔 different, Khan Sir was only saying these all things to Tehreek e Labbaik Pakistan extremist party,but,not to all Indian Muslims or Pakistani Muslims.
He only against Tehreek e Labbaik Pakistan extremist party, because,they were doing wrong ❌,so, don't include Yourself.
So,here Khan Sir is right✅.
But,on other side,if he said 🗣️ that what is the need of coming small kid in this protest,for some extent,I support Khan Sir's statement, because,life of kids in protests are at risks if...
